Reducing air purge usage with FORTiS™ encoders
Achieving energy savings up to 91%
Using an air purge on linear encoders provides a number of reliability benefits, but generating the required flow of dry, clean compressed air requires a considerable amount of energy over the lifetime of a machine. This has an impact on the total cost of ownership and the lifetime CO₂e footprint of the encoders.
Why use an air purge on a linear encoder?
Applying an air purge helps improve the sealing of a linear encoder. If contamination starts to penetrate through the lip seals, the positive pressure in the encoder enclosure helps to push that contamination back out. The air purge is effective against both liquid and particle contaminants.
It also prevents condensation and ensures that the encoder does not "inhale" dirty air as the enclosure cools when a machine is switched off. This is beneficial throughout the machine's lifetime, especially if the lip seals become accidentally damaged by wear, cuts, or chemical hardening by harsh chemicals inside the coolant.
Furthermore, if contaminants enter the encoder enclosure, an air purge can help pump the contamination back out again. In this video, an air purge at 1 bar (0.1MPa) is connected to a FORTiS encoder that has been deliberately flooded with oil.

Find out more
What are the options for an air purge?
Rather than looking at the air purge options as a simple "on" or "off" option, an optimised approach is to match the air purge requirements to the specific axes of a machine.
FORTiS encoders use a unique lip seal material called DuraSeal™. This seals more tightly around the readhead blade, reducing the flow rate of the air purge compared to competitor products. This allows effective sealing to be achieved with a lower air purge pressure.
For axes that are heavily exposed to contamination, especially on machines that are cutting particularly aggressive materials, it is recommended to use the full 1 bar (0.1 MPa) air purge pressure.
However, on many machines the encoders are located in elevated positions, or are relatively remote from the machine chamber. In these circumstances, the encoder will be exposed to significantly less contamination during its lifetime, making it possible to adopt a “low flow ” air purge philosophy and make savings on air purge usage. Applying a “low flow” air purge is a simple process; identify encoders that are good candidates to work at lower pressures, then simply turn down the pressure on the regulator of the air filter, and check the pressure at the encoders.
What savings can be made?
The tighter sealing of FORTiS encoders reduces the flow rate of the air purge from 7-10 litres/minute to 2 litres/minute. Therefore energy (and CO2e) savings of 70-79% can be achieved just by swapping from a competitor encoder to a FORTiS encoder.
However, by adopting the “low flow” air purge approach, additional savings can be achieved. With 0.5 bar (0.05 MPa) air purge pressure, the savings are increased to 84-89%. When the air purge pressure is turned down to 0.25 bar (0.025 MPa), then savings of 91-94% can be achieved.
Notes:
1) This scenario shows the annual energy usage, representing an encoder on a machine that is used for 2 shifts per day, 8 hours per shift, 350 days per year. The air is switched on 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
2) Encoders are switched on 2 shifts per day, 8 hours per shift, 350 days per year.
3) Encoder energy is based on the encoder manufacturer’s published data sheet specification for power supply at 5V, multiplied by the annual usage as describe in notes 1 and 2.
4) Air purge flow rate of 7-10 litres/minute is based on manufacturer’s published data sheet specification for air purge usage.
5) Air purge energy is based on the energy required to provide the annual air usage based on the rate of air flow specified in the manufacturer's published data sheet, at a pressure of 1 bar (0.1 MPa), when the air is switched on for 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. For FORTiS encoders the annual air usage at a flow rate of 2 litres/minute is 0.002 m3/min x 60 x 24 x 365 = 1051 m3/year. For Brand A, the air purge flow rate is specified in the manufacturer's data sheet at 10 litres/minute, so the annual air usage is 0.01 m3/min x 60 x 24 x 365 = 5256 m3/year. For Brand B, the air purge flow rate is specified in the manufacturer's data sheet at 7 litres/minute, so the annual air usage is 0.007m3/min x 60 x 24 x 365 = 3679 m3/year.
6. To calculate the energy required to provide that annual air usage, a representative value of 0.085 kWh/Nm3 has been used. This is a typical value required for an air compressor to provide 1 ‘normal cubic metre’ of compressed air at 1.0 bar pressure (0.1 MPa) and 15 °C to ISO 2533.
When can a "low flow" air purge be used?
Each machine should be evaluated on the level of risk of contamination that the encoders are subject to. The factors that should be considered include:
1) The position of the encoders in the machine.
2) The amount of guarding/sealing between the machine chamber and the encoder location.
3) The type of materials being cut on the machine.
4) The amount of coolant that a specific process requires.
The position of the encoder will have a significant influence on the amount of contamination that the encoder will experience. In general, larger machines expose encoders to less contamination because the encoders are located further from the machining zone. The detailed approach to optimising air purge varies according to the specific type of machine, as described in the following sections.
Vertical Machining Centres
Horizontal Machining Centres
X and Y axes are typically well shielded from contamination, but in some cases the X axis linear encoder can be located under the table.
When the Z axis or X axis linear encoder is under the table, an air purge of 0.5 to 1 bar (0.05 to 0.1 MPa) is appropriate. When the Z axis or X axis linear encoder is located higher in the machine, the air purge pressure can be reduced to 0.25 to 0.5 bar (0.025 to 0.05 MPa).
CNC Tool Grinders
Lathes and Cylindrical Grinders
Large machine tools
Other opportunities for energy savings
Many machines are not used for 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. When they are not being used, the air purge is normally kept switched on to maintain a positive pressure inside the encoder enclosure, which prevents build-up of condensation and stops the "inhaling" effect that occurs when a hot machine cools.
Summary
The superior sealing performance of the FORTiS enclosed linear encoder enables an optimised approach to providing air purge to the encoders on a machine. This "low flow" approach can deliver significant benefits of reduced compressed air consumption, leading to lower associated energy costs, whilst also maintaining the long-term reliability benefits of using air purge systems.
Other opportunities for energy savings
Many machines are not used for 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. When they are not being used, the air purge is normally kept switched on to maintain a positive pressure inside the encoder enclosure, which prevents build-up of condensation and stops the "inhaling" effect that occurs when a hot machine cools.


Summary
The superior sealing performance of the FORTiS enclosed linear encoder enables an optimised approach to providing air purge to the encoders on a machine.
This "low flow" approach can deliver significant benefits of reduced compressed air consumption, leading to lower associated energy costs, whilst also maintaining the long-term reliability benefits of using air purge systems.
Summary
The superior sealing performance of the FORTiS enclosed linear encoder enables an optimised approach to providing air purge to the encoders on a machine.
This "low flow" approach can deliver significant benefits of reduced compressed air consumption, leading to lower associated energy costs, whilst also maintaining the long-term reliability benefits of using air purge systems.
Summary
The superior sealing performance of the FORTiS enclosed linear encoder enables an optimised approach to providing air purge to the encoders on a machine. This "low flow" approach can deliver significant benefits of reduced compressed air consumption, leading to lower associated energy costs, whilst also maintaining the long-term reliability benefits of using air purge systems.

